Working of Inter Currency Conversion: Difference between revisions

From NEOSYS User Support Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: -- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: visual approach allows your words to sink in rather than vapourise btw we have a lot of ignorant accountants who dont know what I am teaching you -- CLIENT--: ok. ...)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: visual approach allows your words to sink in rather than vapourise
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: eg foreign currency handling
 
btw we have a lot of ignorant accountants who dont know what I am teaching you
 
-- CLIENT--: ok.
 
-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: eg foreign currency handling


i have just thought of a beautiful concept that should perhaps illustrate something to you
i have just thought of a beautiful concept that should perhaps illustrate something to you
Line 15: Line 9:
eg fail to enter correct income amount .. then the client account is also wrong
eg fail to enter correct income amount .. then the client account is also wrong


-- CLIENT--: yes
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: yes


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: there is a CONTROL by having TWO sets of accounts
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: there is a CONTROL by having TWO sets of accounts


control means checking versus something else
control means checking versus something else
Line 33: Line 27:
in parallel
in parallel


-- CLIENT--: thats in the current system
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: thats in the current system


ok
ok


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: this is any company using neosys and trading in currency
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: this is any company using neosys and trading in currency


well the currency books can be checked versus the client/supplier/bank etc
well the currency books can be checked versus the client/supplier/bank etc
Line 45: Line 39:
and and discrepancy is chucked into the GAIN AND LOSSES account in the P&L where it causes endless pain to them if wrong
and and discrepancy is chucked into the GAIN AND LOSSES account in the P&L where it causes endless pain to them if wrong


-- CLIENT--: aha. ok
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: aha. ok


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: they always come whining about neosys generating exchange gains and losses
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: they always come whining about neosys generating exchange gains and losses


and then have to mend their ways
and then have to mend their ways
Line 59: Line 53:
boss/management only care about base currency since they want ONE set of reports eg balance sheet and profit and loss that represents the whole picture of all currencies
boss/management only care about base currency since they want ONE set of reports eg balance sheet and profit and loss that represents the whole picture of all currencies


-- CLIENT--: ok. i havent done much with multicurrency so far.. is that in the latest version already?
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: ok. i havent done much with multicurrency so far.. is that in the latest version already?


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: it has been in since year zero
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: it has been in since year zero


-- CLIENT--: ok
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: ok


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: but you dont seem to grasp what I am saying
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: but you dont seem to grasp what I am saying


-- CLIENT--: i do understand what you are saying, but practically i havent tried it as yet
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: i do understand what you are saying, but practically i havent tried it as yet


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: you cant TRY a concept
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: you cant TRY a concept


accountants are scitzphrenic
accountants are scitzphrenic
Line 77: Line 71:
and on the other hand they have to prepare reports to management/shareholders in pure base currency ,,, and the currency amount is IRRELEVENT to management/sholders
and on the other hand they have to prepare reports to management/shareholders in pure base currency ,,, and the currency amount is IRRELEVENT to management/sholders


-- CLIENT--: i get the concept
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: i get the concept


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: many accounting systems are only double entry in the base currency books
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: many accounting systems are only double entry in the base currency books


ie if you add up all the foreign currency from all the accounts .. it doesnt balance
ie if you add up all the foreign currency from all the accounts .. it doesnt balance
Line 91: Line 85:
four line voucher where you expected to see only two lines that you entered
four line voucher where you expected to see only two lines that you entered


-- CLIENT--: ok. i will copy this convo to wiki for future reference
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: ok. i will copy this convo to wiki for future reference


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: really need paper/white board to show it
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: really need paper/white board to show it


imagine this ...
imagine this ...
Line 117: Line 111:
each currency has its currency amount and its base amount
each currency has its currency amount and its base amount


-- CLIENT--: yes. 20 in the base and 20 in the foreign currency
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: yes. 20 in the base and 20 in the foreign currency


same set
same set
Line 123: Line 117:
ok
ok


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: so neosys DOESNT MIX CURRENCIES AT ALL DEEP DOWN
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: so neosys DOESNT MIX CURRENCIES AT ALL DEEP DOWN


it will happily prepare reports for the whole lot merged
it will happily prepare reports for the whole lot merged
Line 137: Line 131:
and the two sides of that slice are the USD amount and the base equivalent of those USD transactions alone.
and the two sides of that slice are the USD amount and the base equivalent of those USD transactions alone.


-- CLIENT--: ok.
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: ok.


i noticed this while investigating Astrids problem
i noticed this while investigating Astrids problem


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: this? meaning which bit of the above
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: this? meaning which bit of the above


-- CLIENT--: ledger printouts in multi-currency
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: ledger printouts in multi-currency


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: thats vague
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: thats vague


-- CLIENT--: requesting for specific currency ledgers of a particular account
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: requesting for specific currency ledgers of a particular account


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: when you send statements it AUTOMATICALLY prints the currency slices separately
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: when you send statements it AUTOMATICALLY prints the currency slices separately


since clients a) couldnt give a damn about your base currency and b) expect to see a separate statement for each currency that they deal in with you EVEN IF YOU PUT THEM ALL INTO A SINGLE NEOSYS ACCOUNT
since clients a) couldnt give a damn about your base currency and b) expect to see a separate statement for each currency that they deal in with you EVEN IF YOU PUT THEM ALL INTO A SINGLE NEOSYS ACCOUNT
Line 165: Line 159:
Sent at 5:46 PM on Sunday
Sent at 5:46 PM on Sunday


-- CLIENT--: ok. so while posting receipt we have to calculate the equivalent for the client and enter it and the actualy amount to the bank can be overridden.
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: ok. so while posting receipt we have to calculate the equivalent for the client and enter it and the actualy amount to the bank can be overridden.


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: neosys doesnt insist that you balance the currencies in a single voucher since it will happily reverse everything into the exchange gains and losses or inter currency conversion a/c
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: neosys doesnt insist that you balance the currencies in a single voucher since it will happily reverse everything into the exchange gains and losses or inter currency conversion a/c


yes
yes
Line 173: Line 167:
Sent at 5:48 PM on Sunday
Sent at 5:48 PM on Sunday


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: bank a/c +1000USD (+3670base) client a/c -3670AED (-3670base) .... and NEOSYS adds two more voucher lines Intercurrency conversion account -1000USD (-3670) and Intercurrency conversion account +3670AED (+3670base)
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: bank a/c +1000USD (+3670base) client a/c -3670AED (-3670base) .... and NEOSYS adds two more voucher lines Intercurrency conversion account -1000USD (-3670) and Intercurrency conversion account +3670AED (+3670base)


1. bank a/c +1000USD (+3670base)
1. bank a/c +1000USD (+3670base)
Line 191: Line 185:
q3. what is the total amount of base currency posted to the intercurrency account (ie its balance after the above transaction assuming it was 0 to start with)
q3. what is the total amount of base currency posted to the intercurrency account (ie its balance after the above transaction assuming it was 0 to start with)


-- CLIENT--: the client account should be -1000USD (-3670base) . right?
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: the client account should be -1000USD (-3670base) . right?


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: yes but that isnt one of the questions
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: yes but that isnt one of the questions


-- CLIENT--: no. i was just clarifying this
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: no. i was just clarifying this


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: this is a receipt so we are increasing the bank and droping the amount the client owes us
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: this is a receipt so we are increasing the bank and droping the amount the client owes us


+bank -client
+bank -client


-- CLIENT--: right, but doesnt he client a/c also have to be in USD?
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: right, but doesnt he client a/c also have to be in USD?


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: why?
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: why?


it can just be a note on the transaction
it can just be a note on the transaction


-- CLIENT--: ok. got it.. sorry. you cannot use USD receipt to pay off AED invoices
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: ok. got it.. sorry. you cannot use USD receipt to pay off AED invoices


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: you MIGHT do a two step process
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: you MIGHT do a two step process


ie credit the clients account with 1000USD as a first step
ie credit the clients account with 1000USD as a first step
Line 229: Line 223:
Sent at 5:59 PM on Sunday
Sent at 5:59 PM on Sunday


-- CLIENT--: q1. what is the total amount of USD posted - 1000 USD to the Bank and 1000 USD to the Intercurrency conversion account
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: q1. what is the total amount of USD posted - 1000 USD to the Bank and 1000 USD to the Intercurrency conversion account


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: total means TOTAL .. not a list
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: total means TOTAL .. not a list


single figure
single figure


-- CLIENT--: its only 1000 USD which gets posted
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: its only 1000 USD which gets posted


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: 1. bank a/c +1000USD (+3670base)
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: 1. bank a/c +1000USD (+3670base)
2. client a/c -3670AED (-3670base)
2. client a/c -3670AED (-3670base)
3. Intercurrency conversion account -1000USD (-3670)
3. Intercurrency conversion account -1000USD (-3670)
Line 248: Line 242:
Sent at 6:05 PM on Sunday
Sent at 6:05 PM on Sunday


-- CLIENT--: 2000USD
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: 2000USD


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: those little + and - mean nothing?
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: those little + and - mean nothing?


-- CLIENT--: zero?
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: zero?


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: yes
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: yes


what is +1000 + -1000?
what is +1000 + -1000?


-- CLIENT--: 0
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: 0


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: 0
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: 0


double entry booking keeping
double entry booking keeping
Line 266: Line 260:
q2 and 3 should be easier now you understand that by total we mean simple arithmetic totals
q2 and 3 should be easier now you understand that by total we mean simple arithmetic totals


-- CLIENT--: q2. what is the total amount of AED posted - 0 again
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: q2. what is the total amount of AED posted - 0 again


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: yes
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: yes


double entry bookkeeping
double entry bookkeeping


-- CLIENT--: q3. what is the total amount of base currency posted to the intercurrency account - 3670
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: q3. what is the total amount of base currency posted to the intercurrency account - 3670


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: nope
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: nope


1. bank a/c +1000USD (+3670base)
1. bank a/c +1000USD (+3670base)
Line 281: Line 275:
4. Intercurrency conversion account +3670AED (+3670base)
4. Intercurrency conversion account +3670AED (+3670base)


-- CLIENT--: 0
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: 0


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: yes
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: yes


how do you feel about those answers
how do you feel about those answers


-- CLIENT--: in the sense?
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: in the sense?


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: i guess they mean nothing to you
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: i guess they mean nothing to you


-- CLIENT--: no. it isnt it. the intercurrency conversion account is used as the contra account for the first 2 entries
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: no. it isnt it. the intercurrency conversion account is used as the contra account for the first 2 entries


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: q1. what is the total amount of USD posted .. answer zero
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: q1. what is the total amount of USD posted .. answer zero


doesnt that feel strange to you?
doesnt that feel strange to you?
Line 303: Line 297:
yet if you received 1000USD and put 1000USD against the clients account you would happily accept that according to double entry booking keeping that the total posted would be zero
yet if you received 1000USD and put 1000USD against the clients account you would happily accept that according to double entry booking keeping that the total posted would be zero


-- CLIENT--: thats the principle of double entry accounting right?
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: thats the principle of double entry accounting right?


oh. ok
oh. ok


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: basically intercurrency accounting has to be turned into single currency accounting using a new concept call the "intercurrency conversion" account if the base amounts agree
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: basically intercurrency accounting has to be turned into single currency accounting using a new concept call the "intercurrency conversion" account if the base amounts agree


we have to invent something called ICC (get it?) in order to reduce all multicurrency transactions to combinations of single currency transactions
we have to invent something called ICC (get it?) in order to reduce all multicurrency transactions to combinations of single currency transactions


-- CLIENT--: ok.
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: ok.


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: what seems like a complexity in the voucher turns out to have radically simplifying effect on the books
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: what seems like a complexity in the voucher turns out to have radically simplifying effect on the books


ie every currency balances independently and can be viewed as standing alone from all other currencies
ie every currency balances independently and can be viewed as standing alone from all other currencies
Line 319: Line 313:
Sent at 6:23 PM on Sunday
Sent at 6:23 PM on Sunday


-- CLIENT--: ok
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: ok


incase you had to directly post the USD to the client aswell?
incase you had to directly post the USD to the client aswell?


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: i gave the answer in detail already ...
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: i gave the answer in detail already ...


-- CLIENT--: 1. bank a/c +1000USD (+3670base)
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: 1. bank a/c +1000USD (+3670base)
2. client a/c -1000USD (-3670base)
2. client a/c -1000USD (-3670base)


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: this can easily happen if you dont know what invoices the 1000USD is for ... so you dump it into the account as an unallocated credit to be sorted out later
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: this can easily happen if you dont know what invoices the 1000USD is for ... so you dump it into the account as an unallocated credit to be sorted out later


-- CLIENT--: right. and do the journal to convert it to AED
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: right. and do the journal to convert it to AED


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: all that happens thereafter is that you do the ORIGINAL voucher ... but the first line is the client a/c instead of the bank a/c
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: all that happens thereafter is that you do the ORIGINAL voucher ... but the first line is the client a/c instead of the bank a/c


look back at the original transaction and subsitute mechanically and ponder the result
look back at the original transaction and subsitute mechanically and ponder the result
Line 340: Line 334:
Sent at 6:29 PM on Sunday
Sent at 6:29 PM on Sunday


-- CLIENT--: you mean debit the client?
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: you mean debit the client?


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: first voucher you debit (+) the bank
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: first voucher you debit (+) the bank


second voucher you debit (+) the client in the first line
second voucher you debit (+) the client in the first line
Line 348: Line 342:
look back at the original transaction and subsitute mechanically the bank for the client and ponder the result
look back at the original transaction and subsitute mechanically the bank for the client and ponder the result


-- CLIENT--: why would you debit the client if you receive the payment?
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: why would you debit the client if you receive the payment?


this is the next voucher after payment received?
this is the next voucher after payment received?


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: yes
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: yes


in case you credit client with 1000USD and LATER decide to use it to pay off AED invoices
in case you credit client with 1000USD and LATER decide to use it to pay off AED invoices
Line 358: Line 352:
LATER means another voucher to a) convert the currency in the account and b) presumably to allocate all in one go
LATER means another voucher to a) convert the currency in the account and b) presumably to allocate all in one go


-- CLIENT--: 1. client a/c +1000USD (+3670base)
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: 1. client a/c +1000USD (+3670base)
2. client a/c -3670AED (-3670base)
2. client a/c -3670AED (-3670base)
3. Intercurrency conversion account -1000USD (-3670base)
3. Intercurrency conversion account -1000USD (-3670base)
4. Intercurrency conversion account +3670AED (+3670base)
4. Intercurrency conversion account +3670AED (+3670base)


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: right
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: right


-- CLIENT--: perfect
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: perfect


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: exactly
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: exactly


the ICC lines appear to confuse unless you keep a clear mind that in base they have NO effect and are just there to ensure that each currency individually balances to zero all the time
the ICC lines appear to confuse unless you keep a clear mind that in base they have NO effect and are just there to ensure that each currency individually balances to zero all the time


-- CLIENT--: ok
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: ok


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: if you are fairly clear on this I can tell you the more usual case where the base DOESNT agree exactly due to bank charges etc
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: if you are fairly clear on this I can tell you the more usual case where the base DOESNT agree exactly due to bank charges etc


-- CLIENT--: yes. i have began to understand this more
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: yes. i have began to understand this more


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: we would like to post this ...
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: we would like to post this ...
1. bank a/c +1000USD (+3670base)
1. bank a/c +1000USD (+3670base)
2. client a/c -3700AED (-3700base)
2. client a/c -3700AED (-3700base)
Line 398: Line 392:
q3. what is the total amount of base currency posted to the EXGA (ie its balance after the above transaction assuming it was 0 to start with)
q3. what is the total amount of base currency posted to the EXGA (ie its balance after the above transaction assuming it was 0 to start with)


-- CLIENT--: 3. GainLossA/c -1000USD (-3670base)
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: 3. GainLossA/c -1000USD (-3670base)
4. GainLossA/c +3700AED (+3700base)
4. GainLossA/c +3700AED (+3700base)


right?
right?


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: yes sorry
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: yes sorry


-- CLIENT--: q1 - 0
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: q1 - 0


q2 - 0
q2 - 0


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: yes ... cannot be anything else according to double entry rules
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: yes ... cannot be anything else according to double entry rules


but the answer to q3 is very interesting
but the answer to q3 is very interesting


-- CLIENT--: q3 - 30 AED ?
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: q3 - 30 AED ?


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: read the question
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: read the question


-- CLIENT--: yes. i have
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: yes. i have


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: the answer is 30base
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: the answer is 30base


-- CLIENT--: yes. i said 30
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: yes. i said 30


sorry. i didnt say 30base
sorry. i didnt say 30base


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: you said 30 AED
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: you said 30 AED


-- CLIENT--: and presumed the base was AED
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: and presumed the base was AED


ok
ok


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: you must never confuse the two
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: you must never confuse the two


there is REAL AED and there is base that happens to be AED
there is REAL AED and there is base that happens to be AED
Line 441: Line 435:
so the answer is completely different
so the answer is completely different


-- CLIENT--: ok
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: ok


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: when we are talking about base we never mention its "sex"
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: when we are talking about base we never mention its "sex"


we can say either 30 base or 30 "equalent in AED"
we can say either 30 base or 30 "equalent in AED"
Line 451: Line 445:
anyway the answer is as you say, 30 base
anyway the answer is as you say, 30 base


-- CLIENT--: ok
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: ok


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: so in the case of multicurrency transactions where the base adds up to zero .. we get entries that have no effect on the consolidated base currency books
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: so in the case of multicurrency transactions where the base adds up to zero .. we get entries that have no effect on the consolidated base currency books


but in the case of multicurrency transactions where the base DOESNT quite add up to zero ... the neosys "I DONT LIKE THIS SO I AM GOING TO REVERSE IT ALL" methodology neatly ends up with the DIFFERENCE showing in EXGA a/c although it is effected by TWO lines (+ and -) instead of a single 30base entru
but in the case of multicurrency transactions where the base DOESNT quite add up to zero ... the neosys "I DONT LIKE THIS SO I AM GOING TO REVERSE IT ALL" methodology neatly ends up with the DIFFERENCE showing in EXGA a/c although it is effected by TWO lines (+ and -) instead of a single 30base entru
Line 459: Line 453:
the neosys method of showing exchange gains and losses as a PAIR of entries in the EXGA a/c allow you to analyse the SOURCE of exchange gains and loss BY CURRENCY!
the neosys method of showing exchange gains and losses as a PAIR of entries in the EXGA a/c allow you to analyse the SOURCE of exchange gains and loss BY CURRENCY!


-- CLIENT--: ok
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: ok


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: the one line exchange gain loss method a) hides the source currency of gain loss and b) means that currencies dont balance per currency
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: the one line exchange gain loss method a) hides the source currency of gain loss and b) means that currencies dont balance per currency


so neosys method although apparently more complex has always eventually been proved an advance over the average accounting system which doesnt keep isolated slices of books for each currency
so neosys method although apparently more complex has always eventually been proved an advance over the average accounting system which doesnt keep isolated slices of books for each currency


-- CLIENT--: ok.
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: ok.


i got to leave now, its 7 pm. i will catch up later with you
i got to leave now, its 7 pm. i will catch up later with you


-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: ok bye .. have you copied this from the beginning?
<B>-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --</B>: ok bye .. have you copied this from the beginning?


-- CLIENT--: yes. all is saved
<B>-- CLIENT --</B>: yes. all is saved

Revision as of 07:22, 15 May 2007

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: eg foreign currency handling

i have just thought of a beautiful concept that should perhaps illustrate something to you

you know how double entry book keeping stops accountants from making mistakes

by ensuring that if they do make a mistake than they make TWO mistakes

eg fail to enter correct income amount .. then the client account is also wrong

-- CLIENT --: yes

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: there is a CONTROL by having TWO sets of accounts

control means checking versus something else

ok the same trick is done with currency

we keep TWO sets of books

one in pure currency

and one in pure base currency

complete two sets of books for the whole company

in parallel

-- CLIENT --: thats in the current system

ok

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: this is any company using neosys and trading in currency

well the currency books can be checked versus the client/supplier/bank etc

then neosys revaluation checks that the base books agree with the currency balances AT THE LATEST RATES

and and discrepancy is chucked into the GAIN AND LOSSES account in the P&L where it causes endless pain to them if wrong

-- CLIENT --: aha. ok

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: they always come whining about neosys generating exchange gains and losses

and then have to mend their ways

ideally for them ... the currency books and the base currency books would never be compared

so you can DEAL WITH YOUR CLIENTS IN ONE WAY AND REPORT TO YOUR BOSSES IN ANOTHER WAY

client/suppliers/banks only care about currency

boss/management only care about base currency since they want ONE set of reports eg balance sheet and profit and loss that represents the whole picture of all currencies

-- CLIENT --: ok. i havent done much with multicurrency so far.. is that in the latest version already?

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: it has been in since year zero

-- CLIENT --: ok

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: but you dont seem to grasp what I am saying

-- CLIENT --: i do understand what you are saying, but practically i havent tried it as yet

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: you cant TRY a concept

accountants are scitzphrenic

one one hand they have to deal with real currency with their clients/suppliers/banks ... and the base equivalent is IRRELEVENT to operations

and on the other hand they have to prepare reports to management/shareholders in pure base currency ,,, and the currency amount is IRRELEVENT to management/sholders

-- CLIENT --: i get the concept

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: many accounting systems are only double entry in the base currency books

ie if you add up all the foreign currency from all the accounts .. it doesnt balance

currency is just a comment on the essential accounts like client/supplier/banks

in neosys we make sure that each and every currency is also balanced to zero using double entry accounting

this why if you debit one currency and credit another currency then you see neosys adding two extra lines to REVERSE the currency amounts ... either into exchange gains and losses if the base amounts are not the same ... or to the special neosys account called "Inter-currency Conversion"

four line voucher where you expected to see only two lines that you entered

-- CLIENT --: ok. i will copy this convo to wiki for future reference

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: really need paper/white board to show it

imagine this ...

you can ask for neosys financial reports for any single currency that you like and it will focus soley on transactions and balances for that currency you chose

ignoring all the other currency transactionsx

so not only does neosys keep complete parallel double entry books for currency and base separately

it also keeps a separate set of books for each currency"

"

!

it just presents them to you as a consolidated position so you think you have one set of books

20 currencies ... in neosys corresponds to 4 separate books of accounts

40 not 4

each currency has its currency amount and its base amount

-- CLIENT --: yes. 20 in the base and 20 in the foreign currency

same set

ok

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: so neosys DOESNT MIX CURRENCIES AT ALL DEEP DOWN

it will happily prepare reports for the whole lot merged

but that is a reporting choice

it isnt part of the system

in a neosys client whose base currency is AED, in settings you can select USD only and UNCONVERTED

and you will see a SLICE of the company which is purely USD transactions

and the two sides of that slice are the USD amount and the base equivalent of those USD transactions alone.

-- CLIENT --: ok.

i noticed this while investigating Astrids problem

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: this? meaning which bit of the above

-- CLIENT --: ledger printouts in multi-currency

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: thats vague

-- CLIENT --: requesting for specific currency ledgers of a particular account

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: when you send statements it AUTOMATICALLY prints the currency slices separately

since clients a) couldnt give a damn about your base currency and b) expect to see a separate statement for each currency that they deal in with you EVEN IF YOU PUT THEM ALL INTO A SINGLE NEOSYS ACCOUNT

a classic error that accountants make with neosys is to assume that you must open separate accounts for each currency that a client or supplier deals in

a true multi-currency accounting system like neosys allows mixed currencies in one account number but automatically gives multiple statements for each currency that is discovered in the account at the time of preparing the statement

this ISOLATION of currencies from each other is the reason why you CANNOT ALLOCATE ONE CURRENCY TO ANOTHER DIRECTLY in NEOSYS

you cannot use USD receipt to pay off AED invoices directly

you can happily post one currency into the bank and a different currency into the client though

Sent at 5:46 PM on Sunday

-- CLIENT --: ok. so while posting receipt we have to calculate the equivalent for the client and enter it and the actualy amount to the bank can be overridden.

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: neosys doesnt insist that you balance the currencies in a single voucher since it will happily reverse everything into the exchange gains and losses or inter currency conversion a/c

yes

Sent at 5:48 PM on Sunday

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: bank a/c +1000USD (+3670base) client a/c -3670AED (-3670base) .... and NEOSYS adds two more voucher lines Intercurrency conversion account -1000USD (-3670) and Intercurrency conversion account +3670AED (+3670base)

1. bank a/c +1000USD (+3670base)

2. client a/c -3670AED (-3670base)

and neosys adds

3. Intercurrency conversion account -1000USD (-3670)

4. Intercurrency conversion account +3670AED (+3670base)

q1. what is the total amount of USD posted

q2. what is the total amount of AED posted

q3. what is the total amount of base currency posted to the intercurrency account (ie its balance after the above transaction assuming it was 0 to start with)

-- CLIENT --: the client account should be -1000USD (-3670base) . right?

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: yes but that isnt one of the questions

-- CLIENT --: no. i was just clarifying this

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: this is a receipt so we are increasing the bank and droping the amount the client owes us

+bank -client

-- CLIENT --: right, but doesnt he client a/c also have to be in USD?

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: why?

it can just be a note on the transaction

-- CLIENT --: ok. got it.. sorry. you cannot use USD receipt to pay off AED invoices

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: you MIGHT do a two step process

ie credit the clients account with 1000USD as a first step

and then CONVERT the USD to AED in the clients account like this

1. client a/c +1000USD (+3670base)

2. client a/c -3670AED (-3670base)

this is a currency conversion transaction on the clients a/c

crediting and debiting the same a/c

no change in the base currency (assuming we are not charging him an exchange commission)

but all this doesnt answer my questions

Sent at 5:59 PM on Sunday

-- CLIENT --: q1. what is the total amount of USD posted - 1000 USD to the Bank and 1000 USD to the Intercurrency conversion account

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: total means TOTAL .. not a list

single figure

-- CLIENT --: its only 1000 USD which gets posted

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: 1. bank a/c +1000USD (+3670base) 2. client a/c -3670AED (-3670base) 3. Intercurrency conversion account -1000USD (-3670) 4. Intercurrency conversion account +3670AED (+3670base)

what is the total USD posted

arithmetic total

Sent at 6:05 PM on Sunday

-- CLIENT --: 2000USD

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: those little + and - mean nothing?

-- CLIENT --: zero?

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: yes

what is +1000 + -1000?

-- CLIENT --: 0

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: 0

double entry booking keeping

q2 and 3 should be easier now you understand that by total we mean simple arithmetic totals

-- CLIENT --: q2. what is the total amount of AED posted - 0 again

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: yes

double entry bookkeeping

-- CLIENT --: q3. what is the total amount of base currency posted to the intercurrency account - 3670

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: nope

1. bank a/c +1000USD (+3670base) 2. client a/c -3670AED (-3670base) 3. Intercurrency conversion account -1000USD (-3670base) 4. Intercurrency conversion account +3670AED (+3670base)

-- CLIENT --: 0

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: yes

how do you feel about those answers

-- CLIENT --: in the sense?

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: i guess they mean nothing to you

-- CLIENT --: no. it isnt it. the intercurrency conversion account is used as the contra account for the first 2 entries

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: q1. what is the total amount of USD posted .. answer zero

doesnt that feel strange to you?

sure the answers are arithmetically clear .. but if they dont feel strange then you missed the point

how is it possible to receive 1000USD yet the total posted into the books is zero ...

yet if you received 1000USD and put 1000USD against the clients account you would happily accept that according to double entry booking keeping that the total posted would be zero

-- CLIENT --: thats the principle of double entry accounting right?

oh. ok

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: basically intercurrency accounting has to be turned into single currency accounting using a new concept call the "intercurrency conversion" account if the base amounts agree

we have to invent something called ICC (get it?) in order to reduce all multicurrency transactions to combinations of single currency transactions

-- CLIENT --: ok.

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: what seems like a complexity in the voucher turns out to have radically simplifying effect on the books

ie every currency balances independently and can be viewed as standing alone from all other currencies

Sent at 6:23 PM on Sunday

-- CLIENT --: ok

incase you had to directly post the USD to the client aswell?

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: i gave the answer in detail already ...

-- CLIENT --: 1. bank a/c +1000USD (+3670base) 2. client a/c -1000USD (-3670base)

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: this can easily happen if you dont know what invoices the 1000USD is for ... so you dump it into the account as an unallocated credit to be sorted out later

-- CLIENT --: right. and do the journal to convert it to AED

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: all that happens thereafter is that you do the ORIGINAL voucher ... but the first line is the client a/c instead of the bank a/c

look back at the original transaction and subsitute mechanically and ponder the result

you can think that the client is your banker by the time of this second voucher

Sent at 6:29 PM on Sunday

-- CLIENT --: you mean debit the client?

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: first voucher you debit (+) the bank

second voucher you debit (+) the client in the first line

look back at the original transaction and subsitute mechanically the bank for the client and ponder the result

-- CLIENT --: why would you debit the client if you receive the payment?

this is the next voucher after payment received?

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: yes

in case you credit client with 1000USD and LATER decide to use it to pay off AED invoices

LATER means another voucher to a) convert the currency in the account and b) presumably to allocate all in one go

-- CLIENT --: 1. client a/c +1000USD (+3670base) 2. client a/c -3670AED (-3670base) 3. Intercurrency conversion account -1000USD (-3670base) 4. Intercurrency conversion account +3670AED (+3670base)

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: right

-- CLIENT --: perfect

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: exactly

the ICC lines appear to confuse unless you keep a clear mind that in base they have NO effect and are just there to ensure that each currency individually balances to zero all the time

-- CLIENT --: ok

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: if you are fairly clear on this I can tell you the more usual case where the base DOESNT agree exactly due to bank charges etc

-- CLIENT --: yes. i have began to understand this more

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: we would like to post this ... 1. bank a/c +1000USD (+3670base) 2. client a/c -3700AED (-3700base)

NEOSYS will add this:

3. GainLossA/c -1000USD (+3670base) 4. GainLossA/c +3700AED (+3700base)

all neosys does is notes that the total base was not exacly zero therefore is doesnt want to do the old method of reversing into the Intercurrency Conversion A/c because the rule is that the ICC a/c base amount must always be zero (and not show in the financial reports which are base currency)

and it reverses them into a different a/c ... the famous Exchange Gains and Loss A/c

to grasp the significance of this you have to ask yourself the same three questions as before ...

which are:

q1. what is the total amount of USD posted q2. what is the total amount of AED posted q3. what is the total amount of base currency posted to the EXGA (ie its balance after the above transaction assuming it was 0 to start with)

-- CLIENT --: 3. GainLossA/c -1000USD (-3670base) 4. GainLossA/c +3700AED (+3700base)

right?

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: yes sorry

-- CLIENT --: q1 - 0

q2 - 0

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: yes ... cannot be anything else according to double entry rules

but the answer to q3 is very interesting

-- CLIENT --: q3 - 30 AED ?

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: read the question

-- CLIENT --: yes. i have

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: the answer is 30base

-- CLIENT --: yes. i said 30

sorry. i didnt say 30base

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: you said 30 AED

-- CLIENT --: and presumed the base was AED

ok

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: you must never confuse the two

there is REAL AED and there is base that happens to be AED

the total AED posted to EXGA is 3700

the total base posted to EXGA is 30

so the answer is completely different

-- CLIENT --: ok

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: when we are talking about base we never mention its "sex"

we can say either 30 base or 30 "equalent in AED"

but never 30 AED because that sounds like we are talking about real chinkable dirhams

anyway the answer is as you say, 30 base

-- CLIENT --: ok

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: so in the case of multicurrency transactions where the base adds up to zero .. we get entries that have no effect on the consolidated base currency books

but in the case of multicurrency transactions where the base DOESNT quite add up to zero ... the neosys "I DONT LIKE THIS SO I AM GOING TO REVERSE IT ALL" methodology neatly ends up with the DIFFERENCE showing in EXGA a/c although it is effected by TWO lines (+ and -) instead of a single 30base entru

the neosys method of showing exchange gains and losses as a PAIR of entries in the EXGA a/c allow you to analyse the SOURCE of exchange gains and loss BY CURRENCY!

-- CLIENT --: ok

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: the one line exchange gain loss method a) hides the source currency of gain loss and b) means that currencies dont balance per currency

so neosys method although apparently more complex has always eventually been proved an advance over the average accounting system which doesnt keep isolated slices of books for each currency

-- CLIENT --: ok.

i got to leave now, its 7 pm. i will catch up later with you

-- NEOSYS SUPPORT --: ok bye .. have you copied this from the beginning?

-- CLIENT --: yes. all is saved